Skip to main content
Contact

Security & Compliance

Prove your systems are actually safe.

Independent assessment and hands-on remediation for teams that need to prove their systems are actually safe, not just functionally complete — particularly relevant given how much of AI and systems integration work touches regulated data.

DPDP Act Compliance · Vulnerability Assessment & Penetration Testing · Black/Grey/White-Box Testing · Security Hardening

Why it matters

A breach costs more than the cleanup.

It costs the trust that took years to build, the regulatory exposure under laws like India's DPDP Act, and the vendor relationships that now require proof of due diligence before they'll sign anything. AI systems raise the stakes further — they touch more data and make more decisions, creating categories of exposure a generic security review isn't built to catch.

What each service actually is

Vulnerability assessment & penetration testing

Systematic identification of exploitable weaknesses, followed by controlled attempts to exploit them safely — the difference between an automated scan and a real test of what an attacker could actually do.

Black-box testing

Testing with no internal knowledge of the system — the same vantage point a real external attacker has. Used to validate what's actually exposed at the perimeter, independent of what the codebase claims.

Grey-box testing

Testing with partial knowledge of the system — the middle ground between a black-box outsider's view and a white-box walkthrough of the source. Used where you want realistic attack simulation without a full code audit on every pass.

White-box testing

A full walkthrough of the source code and architecture alongside the test — the deepest level of scrutiny, used when a system's failure mode is severe enough to justify the engineering time.

DPDP Act compliance advisory

Reviewing what personal data your systems actually collect, where consent is (and isn't) properly recorded, and what changes closing the gap to India's Digital Personal Data Protection Act actually requires — not a generic checklist.

Security hardening & review

Closing the specific gaps a test surfaces — patched configurations, tightened access, corrected file-handling — not a generic checklist applied regardless of what was actually found.

Process

Five steps, from scope to sign-off.

  1. 01

    Scope & threat model

    Define what's in scope, what's explicitly out, and what an attacker would actually be trying to reach — before any testing starts.

  2. 02

    Test execution

    Black, grey, or white-box, matched to what you need to know and how much internal access makes sense to grant for this pass.

  3. 03

    Findings & severity

    Every issue rated by real-world exploitability and impact, not a blanket label applied without context.

  4. 04

    Remediation support

    Fixing what was found, not just handing over a PDF and disappearing.

  5. 05

    Re-test

    Confirming the fix actually closes the gap — not just that a patch was deployed.

Who this is for

Not every team needs this engagement. These do.

  • Teams handling personal, health, or financial data that a breach would expose
  • Teams shipping AI features that touch regulated or sensitive data
  • Teams that need a documented audit trail for a client, investor, or regulator
  • Teams responding to, or recovering from, a security incident

DPDP Act, briefly

What India's data protection law actually requires.

At a high level, the Digital Personal Data Protection Act covers four things most businesses handling personal data now have to address: consent that's specific and can be withdrawn, not implied by a blanket terms-of-service checkbox; data minimization — collecting only what a stated purpose actually requires; breach notification obligations when personal data is compromised; and data principal rights, meaning individuals can request access to, correction of, or erasure of their own data.

This is a starting orientation, not legal advice. The compliance advisory engagement maps these requirements against what your systems actually collect and do.

Methodology

Testing follows public standards, not a proprietary scoring system.

Web and API testing follows an OWASP-aligned methodology, and findings are rated using CVSS-based severity scoring — so prioritization reflects an industry-standard measure of real-world risk, not a subjective label attached after the fact.

Questions

Frequently asked.

How long does a penetration test take?

It depends on scope — defined during the scope call, not before we know what's actually being tested.

Do you provide a written report?

Yes. Every finding is documented with severity, evidence, and a specific remediation recommendation — not a generic scanner printout.

Will testing disrupt production?

Scope and timing are agreed upfront specifically to avoid this. Production-safe testing windows are standard practice, not an afterthought.

What's the difference between a security audit and a penetration test?

An audit reviews configuration, policy, and code against a standard. A penetration test actively attempts to exploit what it finds. Most engagements use both.

Is DPDP compliance mandatory for us?

If you process the personal data of individuals in India, very likely yes. The compliance advisory engagement starts by confirming exactly what applies to your systems.